Skip to contentSkip to gallery information

Quent Cordair Fine Art

Click to chat with
a gallery representative

By the Fountain: Step 6

By the Fountain

The left arm and leg were next to be painted. They represented a relatively small amount of work mainly because both are partially obscured. The one slightly tricky spot was the left foot. Almost completely covered, flexed, and highly foreshortened, I found that until I had fussed with it quite a bit and made the most miniscule adjustments, it really just looked like a weird flesh-colored lump. I fully expect that the right leg, even though it covers more area, will be finished in less time, and with much less reworking.

4 Responses to “By the Fountain: Step 6”

  1. Hannah Says:

    Hi, my name is Hannah and I am a high school student from Southern California. For my IB Visual Arts class I’ve been looking for a modern Romantic artist to ask a few questions concerning romanticism. I discovered your work online and the director of the gallery said I could post my questions here. My questions are stated below:

    What drew you to the romantic realist style?
    Were you influenced at all by traditional romantic art?
    If so, which artist influenced you the most?
    How do you achieve a realistic portrayal of your subject matter?
    Do you use any techniques specific to the romantic realist style?
    How do you create emotion in a piece of art?

    Thank you for your time.

  2. Bryan Larsen Says:

    Hannah,

    Those are a lot of good questions. I will try to answer them thoroughly without being too long-winded.

    First of all, I am not certain I would categorize myself as a true Romantic Realist, even though a lot of my work obviously falls perfectly into that category. To be more accurate, I would say that I am somewhat of a hybrid between a Romantic Realist and a Classical Realist. I make the distinction mainly because I do not like much of the work that is supposedly Romantic Realism, and I think a large amount of what is called Romantic Realism is obviously not. I won’t give examples here. Of course, I don’t think most artists are the ones who end up choosing what style their work is eventually grouped in with. I think they paint according to their own philosophy of art and their own interests, which they may share with some of their contemporaries, their instructors, or a group of painters (or philosophers) from the past.

    So what drew me to the Romantic Realist style? When I read the Romantic Manifesto (A non-fiction philosophical treatise on Art by Ayn Rand) I found that I agreed very closely with most of the book. I particularly agree with Ayn Rand’s assessment of the importance of Art to civilization and to philosophy. I also agree with her that theme and subject matter are of absolute importance. In short, I found I had more in common with her artistic philosophy than with any other I was familiar with.

    I was definitely influenced by traditional romantic Art. In particular, I was influenced by the Pre-Raphaelites Sir John Everett Millais, and William Holman Hunt, though more for their execution and their work ethic than their themes (Though ‘The Huguenot’ by Millais is, I think, an exceptional painting thematically as well as technically). I also loved the fact that they valued technique and craftsmanship as highly as theme and subject matter. I also really enjoy the work of Bouguereau. Again, his style, this technique and his absolute mastery of the figure are much more a factor for me than his themes which are often, though not always, quite boring. He also had a work ethic that would blow the minds of most hard working people, and was extraordinarily prolific. Basically, most of what influenced me in the work of the traditional Romantic painters and the Classical Realists was their technique, their craftsmanship and their execution. I wanted to keep all of that, and add romantic themes and contemporary subjects and settings. I am also a fan of a few more recent artists who I believe are somewhat inaccurately classified simply as illustrators. Maxfield Parrish and Alex Ross are two examples. Another thing these artists have in common that I find particularly wonderful is that they were all sane, intelligent, people who were respected working professionals. They may have had eccentricities, but none of them were driven by some irrational, unknowable passion that forced them to paint almost against their will. I hate that stereotype.

    I achieve a realistic portrayal of my subject matter through a lot of practice, a lot of work, and by painting from reality: models or photographic reference.

    I don’t believe that any of my techniques are specific to the Romantic style. Most of my technique was self taught by reading about classical techniques or learned from the few illustration classes I had. I also learned a great deal from working with Damon Denys who is also self-taught, and observing the paintings I could by painters I admire. My technique is also constantly evolving as I practice and gain more experience.

    Creating emotion in a work of art can be achieved though several mechanisms: the color scheme, the rigidity or softness of the lines, the layout of the composition or the body language and facial expressions of any figures that may be in the painting. I think emotion is most effectively achieved when all of these things are working together.

    I hope that gives you enough to work with. If you have any further questions or need any clarification, you can get my contact information from the gallery. Thank you for participating in the Studio, and giving me something new to talk about.

  3. Angel Says:

    To Bryan Larsen,

    I can not begin to tell you how much I enjoy seeing your work in progress. I love that you share the birth of you art. Being an artist myself, you are my favorite. Just being able to see your work has been very inspiring and I learn a lot from your work. Thank you Byran for sharing your work online.

  4. Bryan Larsen Says:

    Angel,

    I am glad to hear you are enjoying the Artist’s Studio. In particular I am interested to know that, as an artist, you are finding the Art inspirational and the commentary interesting and somewhat instructive. Out of curiosity, and a desire to provide the most interesting reading possible, perhaps you would be willing to let me know, either in the studio or by email, what about the posts has been most useful to you. I will certainly understand if you prefer to remain anonymous.

    As for sharing the process behind my work, it is my pleasure. I will keep posting work to the studio as long as people are willing to read it.

Leave a Reply

About Bryan Larsen ~

Bryan Larsen

"I was born on February 12, 1975, and have been drawing as long as I can remember. By the time I was in high school, I knew I wanted to be an artist, although at the time I didn't have a clear idea of how exactly I would use my talents to make a living.

"As I continued studying art, I began to suspect that fine visual art was dead. No one seemed interested in teaching students how to draw well, or paint well. More often than not, my own skills exceeded those of my instructors.

"The only field left that seemed to require good drawing, painting, and compositional skills was illustration, and therefore I began studying illustration at Utah State University in Logan, Utah. I became even more convinced that I had made the right decision in staying away from fine art as I endured course after course of required "drawing" and "painting" classes in which instructors required me to draw with "less focus", or use ridiculous materials such as shellac, glue, sand, salt, etc.

"My second year at Utah State, I met Damon Denys. In discussing Art with him I realized that there were other people who believed that technique and subject matter were indispensable components of any work of art. I then decided that I would work to develop my own painting skills with the purpose of creating artwork that I considered worthy of being called Fine Art.

"Since that time, I have studied on my own: Drawing from live models to learn the human form, studying proper painting techniques from any source I could find ample reason to trust, and developing a philosophy of Art based on reason, and life on earth.

"My goal is to portray the heroic and romantic in human nature and human achievement in a realistic style and a modern setting. I place particular emphasis on composition, technique, realistic detail, proper craftsmanship and consistency of style."